An iconospastic man muses on why the word “priest” means “leader of the herd (of cattle)” and why the root word for “church” comes from a greek name, (Circe) a name that is describing a naughty wee lady who invites people into her home by beguiling them, where then she hypnotises them, turning them into dumb stupid animals, which she then lives off of or consumes until they’re dead.
Let´s all be honest for one second, what do you truly understand in any tangible manner about God or even spirituality?
Manly P Hall summed it up quite nicely, I will paraphrase him – “If any man can tell you anything about the Divine, in words and terms that you can understand, all that has been proved is that this man is a fraud and knows nothing, as our pea- sized brains do not have the capability to understand anything in a true sense about God or the Divine”.
What are we thinking when we send our children to Sunday school for example? (Or whatever variation for the denomination or religion you belong to). We ourselves truly understand nothing of what is being really taught at these establishments, yet we still send our children off to be indoctrinated by these people, and if it isn´t confusing and horrible enough, then we also, by our negligence and ignorance, allow some of our children to be introduced at these establishments to some bizarre and evil concepts like homophobic homosexuals, or patriarch paedophiles!! If you think this is a trivial matter, look around you FFS. I questioned everything at Sunday School myself, but was open to hearing almost everything. -Who went to heaven, a good guy who behaved impeccably throughout his whole life THAT DIDN’T BELIEVE, or a serial murdering, thieving cunt paedophile who said sorry on his deathbed? That was the sort of question that I asked at Sunday school – (don´t think I had mentioned paedophilia mind you because it was a relatively unknown thing in my youth tbh), paradoxically it was the church who truly educated me on this matter too when the revelations started coming out about their priests.
Incidentally and to get back on point, do you know what the word priest means?
Here´s another nugget from that fountain of wisdom that is Mr Jordan Maxwell, this was taken from his website:
As you can see “head of cattle” or “leader of a herd” denotes to me at least that we are some sort of lower beast, as you will find out, quite a lot of the institutions I will refer to in my later and already in my previous efforts describe us (the people) in these derogatory terms. Like our leaders, our laws and our religions. Quote taken from Webster´s dictionary.
Currently the people brought up as Christian, and the people who were raised as Muslims, and also including those who are Jewish, are for all intensive purposes, ALL involved in a conflict,- one that began with what you were first taught at a Sunday school (or derivative thereof depending on circumstances) that has collectively affected our beliefs so much, that the idea sending your sons and daughters to die fighting these people, not only doesn’t sound ludicrous, to many it will seem like the Christian thing to do (or your own derivative). Don´t you think the Jihadist´s family is thinking the same thing? Or the Zionists? It boils down to whose God is “more” right, and low and behold, as it turns out in this case, they ALL have the same God! – Logic alone tells me (surely you too?) that something is SERIOUSLY wrong with this state of affairs.
Where do we get the word “Church?” from?
In ancient Greece there was the legend an old women known as mother Circe, she would entice people into her home, once inside she would beguile and hypnotise them, turning them into farm animals like pigs, then she would feed on them. According to my good friend Jordan, mother Circe became mother Kirk, which in turn became mother Church. Now it is mother church who hypnotizes people, then brings them into her house, and who then feeds off of them, – just as mother Circe used to do before.
In Scotland it is just as ridiculous; we argue and fight over Protestant or Catholic supremacy (Scotland’s secret shame as it is called). Thousands of these morons are more than willing to harm one another over a religious belief, what gets me really wound up about it, is this, when was the last time most of these people actually set foot inside a church or chapel, where it wasn´t for (as my dad used to say) Hatches, Matches or Despatches? (Births, Marriages, and Deaths) – It is madness of the highest calibre, these braying morons will fight over a man who supposedly preached in such situations to turn the other cheek, yet it is always the last thing any of these people will do, surely no matter what your beliefs are you can see the sheer lunacy of this behaviour. Why would we ever knowingly introduce an innocent wee soul to this ideology of hatred and filth?
Two more points, has no-one else noticed apart from me that God only speaks to nutcases and fanatics anyway?
And also, if God is an environmentalist why doesn´t he just shout “I´m here. FUCKING Behave!” – Think of all the trees that wouldn´t need to be chopped down for Bibles, Korans, Torahs, etc.
My view on this matter was thus, (though admittedly not so well formed) – If I am expected to understand concepts like religion enough that one day I may choose to lay my life down for these beliefs, surely that must mean that my fragile mind can grasp other things too? It was like so many aspects of my formative years, on one hand I was expected to understand complex ideas or issues, next thing I am treated like a noisy nobody who can´t understand anything.
Shouldn´t you or I either go the whole hog with the “truth” or not at all? Otherwise all you’re really learning is, – tell the truth – unless it doesn´t suit your needs.
Not one of the first lessons we should be teaching our children, (or yourself) wouldn´t you agree?
I can imagine a few religious type people screaming at a page over that statement, look I am not talking about making any child grow up too quickly, or robbing children of their innocence before they have enjoyed it; in fact listening to children discussing matters makes me genuinely happy. Their honesty and innocence gives them absolutely no fear in tackling any subject, which is like music to hear, no matter how old the lips who uttered the words. They carry no baggage and rarely choose opinions to suit agendas (unless of course that opinion allows them to have a wee bit more chocolate, a few more pushes on a swing, or has anything to do with staying up a little later to watch TV, in these circumstances even children will learn quite young how to lie a little in order to get what they want, though they are hardly convincing at it, even if they are endearing).
Ultimately we get back only what we have dished out all that time. Initially though it was YOU and I who taught them how to lie, they didn´t know how to, – remember that fact.
I certainly don´t wish to make them old before their time. I´d lay down my life to protect that. – My point is this;
WE need to understand things a lot more than WE do by the time WE reach adulthood in order to better communicate things to children. Only when we have truly been honest to ourselves can we ever hope to be honest with them, if we break this cycle, which I personally believe is easier to accomplish than people realise, only then can we begin to pass on the truth to our children. No money, not that much effort, and most importantly no one is harmed, if you know one, please tell me an easier way that you can imagine for changing everything for the better without need for another war?
If you truly understood that which you were explaining to them, then your answer would never be “That´s the way it is” or “Because I say so”. This switching on and off your relationship with your offspring cannot be good, on the other hand if the child understands the real reasons why (even if you do have to take a little more time in order to explain it in a way that they understand) not only do they learn a lesson they will implement in their own lives, but pretty soon they will also learn to think for themselves, which in case you´re not aware is the best start ANY parent can give to their offspring. Note – (They will also leave home quicker too, if you don´t give them the facts and then allow them to work other things out for themselves, you´ll never teach them to be independent, which means they´ll always be reliant on you or someone else for everything.)
That´s probably the first thing I have said that will mean anything to many of you who are reading this I bet, simply because it is a truism that affects their purses or wallets.
You’d best go and lean on whatever church you’re being sucked dry by for some solace –
AND THERE ARE MANY MANY CHURCHES OUT THERE. – THERE’S THE OBVIOUS ONES THAT I’VE JUST DISCUSSED – BUT THERE ARE MANY MORE LITTLE CHURCHES OUT THERE SUCKING THE VERY LIFE OUT OF YOU WHILE KEEPING YOU SPELLBOUND AS THEY DO.
– CULTS ARE JUST MINI CHURCHES, THEY USE YOU IN THE SAME EXACT SAME WAY CIRCE DID, THEY JUST DON’T HAVE IT DOWN PAT AT THE CORPORATE LEVEL YET, BUT SOME WILL PERSEVERE UNTIL THEY GO SEMI MAINSTREAM. AND CULTS COME IN MANY FORMS – FASHION, DRUGS, VANITY, EGO, REPUTATION, MONEY, GREED, SEX, DEPRAVITY, HATE, BEING IN THE IN CROWD, ALL OF THESE ARE CULTS TOO.
– CLIQUES ARE MINI CULTS, THEY’RE WINGING IT MORE THAN A CULT, THEY ARE MORE NEBULOUS AND POLYMORPHOUS IN NATURE TOO, – IN SHORT, THEY CAN CHANGE IDEOLOGY AS OFTEN AS THE WIND CHANGES THE DIRECTION YOUR FART’S GETTING BLOWN IN.
THEN THERE’S THE CHURCHES OF ONE, INDIVIDUALS CAN AND DO DISPLAY ALL OF CIRCE’S CHARACTERISTICS, SO WATCH OUT FOR WHO YOU GET DOWN ON YOUR KNEES FOR. – THEY MAY WELL BE A ONE MAN/CHICK “CULT” OR CHURCH.
THEN THERE’S THE PROTO-PRIESTS, AND PRIESTESSES, WHO JUST NEED TO GUIDE THE HERD (FOR THEIR OWN BENEFIT), – BEWARE – WHEN THERE’S ENOUGH OF THEM GROUPED TOGETHER THEY’LL FORM A FUCKING PRIESTHOOD, IT’LL COMPRISE A SMALL GROUP WHO, ACCORDING TO THEMSELVES ONLY, AND THE MIRROR (IN WHATEVER FORM THIS REFLECTION TAKES, ORAL, WRITTEN OR EVEN ON A PHONE OR COMPUTER SCREEN) THEY CAN’T STOP LOOKING AT, THEY BELIEVE AT HEART THAT THEY ARE THE ONLY TRULY ENLIGHTENED, THEY WILL ACT AS IF THEY POSSESS KNOWLEDGE THAT WILL BE PORTRAYED AS WISDOM. – AND IT WILL ALWAYS BE LAPPED UP AND VENERATED BY THE CREDULOUS. BECAUSE SURELY IF YOU AGREE WITH A SMART GUY THAT MAKES YOU A LITTLE BIT SMART TOO? – BUT, THEY WILL NEVER REALLY SHOW YOU HOW TO THINK FOR YOURSELF, OR WHY WOULD YOU NEED THEM?
IN TRUTH THEY KNOW NO MORE THAN YOU – THEY MAY WELL SOUND LIKE THEY DO THOUGH. BUT GO ASK THEM FOR WORKABLE SOLUTIONS TO REAL PROBLEMS AND ALL THEY HAVE IS FAUX, OR EVEN REAL SYMPATHY, BUT THEY NEVER HAVE ANY REAL TOUGH LOVE ADVICE OR SOLUTIONS TO YOUR VERY REAL PROBLEMS. – JUST FEEL GOOD MEME’S, SHALLOW TRITE NOT VERY FORWARD THINKING WAFFLE, OR PLAIN OLD FASHIONED GARDEN VARIETY DOWNRIGHT LIES – (THE COLOUR OF WHICH IS ACTUALLY IRRELEVANT).
THIS PROCESS OF ELEVATING MEN AND WOMEN ABOVE OURSELVES IS THE ROOT OF NEARLY ALL OF OUR PROBLEMS, UNTIL WE REALISE THAT WE ARE ALL EQUAL, AND THAT GIVEN THE CHANCE WE CAN ALL CONTRIBUTE IN OUR OWN WAY, IF WE COULD JUST TAKE THIS ONE STEP WE WOULD SOON REALISE THE HARD FACT THAT WE CAN ALL WORK AND THRIVE TOGETHER – WITHOUT THE NEED FOR A FUCKING LEADER!
(WE CAN DO THIS BY REVERTING TO MAKING POSITIONS OF APPARENT LEADERSHIP A RESPONSIBILITY, AND NOT JUST A TICKET FOR THE GRAVY TRAIN. – A YOU DON’T GET VOTED IN, YOU GET VOTED OUT SORT OF DEAL. – YOU DON’T GET ANY BENEFIT FOR YOUR POSITION, AS I SAID LEADERSHIP SHOULD REVERT BACK TO BEING A RESPONSIBILITY AND NOT IN ANY FUCKING WAY A POSITION OF PRIVILEGE, OR ONE TO BE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF.
UNTIL THAT IS HOW WE VIEW ANYONE IN AN APPARENT POSITION OF SO CALLED POWER AGAIN, THEN ALL WE ARE EVER DOING IS STAYING WITHIN THE EXACT SAME FUCKING HIERARCHACAL – SOMEONE DO ALL THE THINKING FOR ME, JUST TELL ME WHAT TO DO – TYPE SITUATION THAT YOU SO CALLED “CLUED UP” “AWAKE” “AWARE” “SPIRITUALLY ENLIGHTENED” “KNOW THE SCORE” CROWD ARE SUPPOSED TO BE AGAINST WITH ALL YOUR BEING!!!!!).
THAT IS WHAT I AM TRYING TO IMPART TO YOU OF ALL IN NEARLY EVERYTHING I WRITE, WE NEED TO LOOK INSIDE TO BE HONEST WITH OURSELVES AND SEE OUR OWN CAPABILITY, BUT AT THE SAME TIME WE NEED TO COME TO TERMS WITH THE BLATANTLY OBVIOUS FACT THAT WE MOST CERTAINLY DO NEED TO WORK TOGETHER.
– SO THIS BECOMING A SOLITARY ROCK ON YOUR OWN IDEA, THAT SOME ESPOUSE, IS WHETHER YOU KNOW IT OR NOT, EXACTLY WHAT THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN MANIPULATING HUMANITY SINCE WE FIRST STARTED LIVING TOGETHER AS A COLLECTIVE GROUP WANT YOU TO DO – MORE THAN ANYTHING, IT IS IN ESSENCE THE VERY CORE PRINCIPAL OF THE NEW AGE RELIGION OF HUMANISM THAT WE HAVE ALL BEEN INDOCTRINATED INTO, WHETHER CONSCIOUSLY OR NOT, OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST CENTURY OR SO.
THE CHURCH (OR THE COLLECTIVE MAFIA CORPORATION OF ALL CHURCHES INC. – A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF THE BLACK KNOBILTY OF EUROPE PLC. – TO GIVE IT ITS PROPER TITLE) HASN’T BEEN ABLE TO KEEP YOU PETRIFIED AND COMPLIANT WITH JUST THE FEAR OF GOD FOR NEARLY 200 YEARS, SO THEY CHANGED TACK IN A COUPLE OF WAYS, IF THEY CAN’T MAKE YOU SCARED OF GOD, THEY SURE AS HELL MADE A LOT OF US SCARED OF EVIL AND ITS APPARENT OWNER THE DEVIL, AND AT THE SAME TIME THEOSOPHY WAS THE ROOTS OF THE HUMANIST NEW AGE CHURCH (THE ONE CHURCH WITH MANY MANY BRANCHES – SECULAR HUMANISM, RATIONALISM, DARWINISM, WICCA, VOODOO, SATANISM, SUFISM, UFO-ISM, SPIRITUALIST GHOSTY STUFF, FAUX-MAGIC, (BECAUSE SOME MAGIC IS REAL) ETC ETC). – HERE’S SOME INFO ON IT FROM CRAP OLD WIKI –
“One of the few things on which all scholars are agreed concerning New Age is that it is difficult to define. Often, the definition given actually reflects the background of the scholar giving the definition.
Thus, the New Ager views New Age as a revolutionary period of history dictated by the stars; the Christian apologist has often defined new age as a cult; the historian of ideas understands it as a manifestation of the perennial tradition; the philosopher sees New Age as a monistic or holistic worldview; the sociologist describes New Age as a new religious movement (NRM); while the psychologist describes it as a form of narcissism.” – Religious studies scholar Daren Kemp, 2004.
Also from the same wiki article on the new age – “According to scholar Nevill Drury, the New Age has a “tangible history”,[28] although Hanegraaff expressed the view that most New Agers were “surprisingly ignorant about the actual historical roots of their beliefs”.
[29] As a form of Western esotericism,[30] the New Age has antecedents that stretch back to southern Europe in Late Antiquity.[31]Following the Age of Enlightenment in 18th century Europe, new esoteric ideas developed in response to the development of scientific rationality.
This new esoteric trend is termed occultism by scholars, and it was this occultism which would be a key factor in the development of the worldview from which the New Age emerged.[32]
One of the earliest influences on the New Age was the Swedish 18th century Christian mystic Emanuel Swedenborg, who professed the ability to communicate with angels, demons, and spirits.
Swedenborg’s attempt to unite science and religion and his prediction of a coming era in particular have been cited as ways in which he prefigured the New Age movement.
[33] (MY NOTE – IN MY HUMBLE OPINION NOW YOU MAY ACTUALLY KNOW AFTER READING THAT WHO THE BORG REPRESENTS ON BLOODY STAR TREK – TRANSHUMANIST, SATURN LOVING, RATIONALIST, NIHILIST, TOTALITARIAN SOCIALISTS. GO ON, JUST GET A CHIP AND JOIN THE COLLECTIVE. LOL)
Another early influence was the late 17th and early 18th century German physician and hypnotist Franz Mesmer, who claimed the existence of a force known as “animal magnetism” running through the human body.[34]
The establishment of Spiritualism, an occult religion influenced by both Swedenborgianism and Mesmerism, in the U.S. during the 1840s has also been identified as a precursor to the New Age movement, in particular through its rejection of established Christianity, its claims to representing a scientific approach to religion, and its emphasis on channeling spirit entities.[35]
A further major influence on the New Age was the Theosophical Society, an occult group co-founded by the Russian Helena Blavatsky in the late 19th century. In her books Isis Unveiled (1877) and The Secret Doctrine (1888), Blavatsky claimed that her Society was conveying the essence of all world religions, and it thus emphasized a focus on comparative religion.[36]
Another was New Thought, which developed in late nineteenth century New England as a Christian-oriented healing movement before spreading throughout the United States.[37] Drury also identified as an important influence upon the New Age movement the Indian Swami Vivekananda, an adherent of the philosophy of Vedanta who first brought Hinduism to the West in the late 19th century.[38]
“Most of the beliefs which characterise the New Age were already present by the end of the 19th century, even to such an extent that one may legitimately wonder whether the New Age brings anything new at all.” — Scholar of esotericism Wouter Hanegraaff, 1996.[39]
Popularisation behind these ideas has roots in the work of early 20th century writers such as D. H. Lawrence and William Butler Yeats. In the early- to mid-1900s, American mystic, theologian, and founder of the Association for Research and Enlightenment Edgar Cayce was a seminal influence on what later would be termed the New Age movement; he was known in particular for the practice some refer to as channeling.[40]
Another prominent influence was the psychologist Carl Jung,[41] who was a proponent of the concept of the Age of Aquarius.[42][43][44]
Hanegraaff believed that the New Age movement’s direct antecedents could be found in the UFO religions of the 1950s, which he termed a “proto-New Age movement”.[45]
Many of these new religious movements had strong apocalyptic beliefs regarding a coming new age, which they typically asserted would be brought about by contact with extraterrestrials.[46]
COUGH COUGH, AHEM, NUDGE NUDGE WINK WINK, NODS AS GOOD AS A WINK, WORD TO THE WISE, ETC. – GO READ THAT AGAIN ICKETTEERS AND STARCHILDREN.
Examples of such groups included the Aetherius Society, founded in the UK in 1955, and the Heralds of the New Age, established in New Zealand in 1956.[47]
From a historical perspective, the New Age phenomenon is rooted in the counterculture of the 1960s.[48]
Although not common throughout the counterculture, usage of the terms “New Age” and “Age of Aquarius” – used in reference to a coming era – were found within it,[49] for instance appearing on adverts for the Woodstock festival of 1969,[50] and in the lyrics of “Aquarius”, the opening song of the 1967 musical Hair: The American Tribal Love-Rock Musical.[51] This decade also witnessed the emergence of a variety of new religious movements and newly established religions in the United States, creating a spiritual milieu from which the New Age drew upon; these included the San Francisco Zen Center, Transcendental Meditation, Soka Gakkai, the Inner Peace Movement, the Church of All Worlds, and (AHEM) – the Church of Satan.[52] Although there had been an established interest in Asian religious ideas in the U.S. from at least the eighteenth-century,[53] many of these new developments were variants of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sufism which had been imported to the West from Asia following the U.S. government’s decision to rescind the Asian Exclusion Act in 1965.[54] In 1962 the Esalen Institute was established in Big Sur, California.[55] It was from Esalen and other similar personal growth centers which had developed links to humanistic psychology that the human potential movement emerged, which would also come to exert a strong influence on the New Age movement.[56]
In Britain, a number of small religious groups that came to be identified as the “light” movement had begun declaring the existence of a coming new age, influenced strongly by the Theosophical ideas of Blavatsky and Bailey.[57]
AS I SAID LOVE AND LIGHTERS ARCHONITES AND SATURN FEEDERS WHEN YOU GET TO THE SOURCE OF MOST OF THE LIGHT YOU GUYS N GALS WANT TO SHARE IT ALL POINTS BACK TO A MOVEMENT CREATED, FUNDED, SUPPORTED AND PLUGGED BY THE REAL PEOPLE WHO LORD OVER US. – YOU CAN BLAME ANYONE/THING YOU WANT AS LONG AS IT’S NOT ACTUALLY REAL, BUT YOU MUST NEVER EVER POINT AT JUST THEM AND THEIR IDEOLOGY, – IT’S GOT TO BE FUCKING A DERANGED E.T. – THE KNOWER OF EVERYTHING IN THE GALAXY – EXCEPT DETAILS ON THE HUMAN ARSEHOLE IT APPEARS – EITHER THAT, OR CASPER THE CONSPIRATORIAL GHOST, OR SOME OTHER TOTALLY MADE UP SPECIOUS BASELESS UNPROVABLE SHIT.
….and further on in the same article…New Age theology exhibiting an inclusivist and universalistic approach which accepts all personal perspectives on the divine as being equally valid.[92] This intentional vagueness as to the nature of divinity also reflects the New Age idea that divinity cannot be comprehended by the human mind or language.[93] There are nevertheless a number of traits that are repeatedly associated with divinity in New Age literature, the first of which is the idea that it is holistic, thus frequently being described with such terms as an “Ocean of Oneness”, “Infinite Spirit”, “Primal Stream”, “One Essence”, and “Universal Principle”.[93] A second common trait is the characterisation of divinity as “Mind”, “Consciousness”, and “Intelligence”,[94] while a third is the description of divinity as a form of “energy”.[95] A fourth trait is the characterisation of divinity as a “life force”, the essence of which is creativity,[95] while a fifth is the concept that divinity consists of love.[96]
(NOTICE HOW FAR DOWN THAT LIST LOVE CAME, HMMM)
Most New Age groups subscribe to the view that there is an Ultimate Source from which all things originate, which is usually conflated with the divine.[97] Various creation myths have been articulated in New Age publications outlining how this Ultimate Source came to create the universe and everything in it.[98] In contrast, some other New Agers have emphasised the idea of a universal inter-relatedness that is not always emanating from a single source.[99] The New Age worldview emphasises holism and the idea that everything in existence is intricately connected as part of a single whole,[100] in doing so rejecting both the dualism of Judeo-Christian thought and the reductionism of Cartesian science.[101]
A number of New Agers have linked this holistic interpretation of the universe to the Gaia hypothesis of James Lovelock.[102]
The idea of holistic divinity results in a common New Age belief that humans themselves are divine in essence, a concept described using such terms as “droplet of divinity”, “inner Godhead”, and “divine self”.[103] Influenced by Theosophical and Anthroposophical ideas regarding ‘subtle bodies’,[104] a common New Age idea holds to the existence of a “Higher Self” which is a part of the human but which connects with the divine essence of the universe, and which can advise the human mind through intuition.[105] (MY NOTE HAVEN’T INCLUDED REFERNCES BUT NUMBERED HYPERLINKS DURING THE ARTICLE SHOULD STILL WORK, OR JUST GO LOOK AT THE ENTIRE THING YOURSELF).
– SO, DOES ANY OF THAT SOUND JUST A LITTLE BIT FAMILIAR TO THE SUPPOSEDLY “CLUED UP” ESPECIALLY THE PARAGRAPH DIRECTLY ABOVE THESE WORDS?
– THIS WHOLE MOVEMENT OF “OURS” WAS ALL CONSTRUCTED FROM THE TOP DOWN, SOLELY FOR THE “NON BELIEVERS” (AND EVENTUALLY FOR US ALL).
AND IT’S BEEN BY “THE BOOK” ARMAGEDDON JUST-A-COMING TYPE CHAOS FOR THE BELIEVERS, – MOST CONTEMPORANEOUSLY IN THE IN THE 1960’S
– TO GET YOU BELIEVERS, OR HALF HEARTED BELIEVERS, OR JUST THOSE WHO USE THEIR CHURCH AND GOD AS SOME KIND OF “MENTAL INSURANCE POLICY” (THAT YOU’LL CASH IN WHEN NEARING YOUR DEMISE), TO STILL BELIEVE IN THEIR GOD “THEY”
(THE PRIESTS, MEN AND WOMEN ONES – NOT ALIENS, OR SATURN IN A SUIT, OR GHOSTS, OR THE ARCHONS, IT WAS ALL JUST THE WORK OF MEN AND FUCKING WOMEN JUST LIKE YOU OR I.)
WELL, THESE PRIESTS AND PRIESTESSES JUST STARTED PUSHING THE WHOLE DEVIL ANGLE INSTEAD – THAT’S WHY ALL THOSE EXORCISM FILMS STARTED APPEARING, ALSO THE WHOLE CHURCH OF SATAN/SET ANGLE, THE SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE EXPLOSION, (IN REALITY JUST A RECRUITING CLUB FOR THE SEMI INTELLECTUAL USED FOR BLACKMAILING AND BONDING FOR THE PUPPETS OF THOSE, WHO WERE AND STILL ARE, IN REAL CONTROL) THE REASON FOR THIS IS THE SAME AS THE REASON THAT HAS EXISTED THROUGHOUT HISTORY FOR MOST COVENS, THE HELLFIRE CLUB, THE BOHOMOIAN GROVE, THE FRANKISTS, THE SABBATTEANS, (THE LIST IS ENORMOUS). IT IS ALSO THE REAL REASON BEHIND THE EXPLOSION OF SEX, DRUGS, ROCK AND KONTROL, FREE LOVE (IRONIC THAT ALL IT DONE WAS ATTEMPT TO KILL ACTUAL LOVE), THE SEXUALISATION OF OUR CHILDREN, THE ATTEMPTED NORMALISATION OF PAEDOPHILIA, AND THE ENTIRE SEMI RECENT METRO-SEXUAL “TRY-SEXUALITY” EPIDEMIC SWEEPING THE SO CALLED DEVELOPED NATIONS:
– WE ARE SUPPOSED TO EITHER BE HORRIFIED THAT SOCIETY IS FALLING APART OR WE’RE JUST TO BE SAYING “FUCK IT!” AND BE PARTYING LIKE IT’S 1999 (17 YEARS NOW MAYBE TIME TO CHILL DON’T YOU THINK?) – FUCKING THE PAIN AWAY, LIKE STRAY FUCKING MUTTS.
THE THING IS, ON SOME BASE LEVEL, WHETHER YOU ADMIT IT TO YOURSELF OR NOT, IF YOU DO BELIEVE IN SOME DEVIL, SATAN, OR THE OPPOSER, IN ANY FORM, ON SOME LEVEL, YOU MUST ALSO LEAVE ROOM FOR THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT EQUATION I.E. A “GOD” OR “GODDESS”, OR JUST THE PRINCIPLE OF GOOD). – AND THAT’S HOW THEY OWN US – WHATEVER OF THE PREVAILING IDEOLOGIES YOU CHOOSE TO BUY INTO.
BELIEVER, HUMANIST, NEW AGER, UFO WORSHIPPERS, GHOST GROPERS, ARCHONITES, CONEHEAD COVETERS, BUY INTO WHATEVER FLAVOUR OF SHITE YOU WISH. – THEY ALL CAME FROM THE SAME SHOP AND YOU CAN’T SEE IT.
EINSTEIN SUPPOSEDLY QUIPPED THAT DOING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER, YET EXPECTING DIFFERENT RESULTS WAS THE VERY DEFINITION OF INSANITY.
CHURCHES, CULTS, CLIQUES, PRIESTS. AND IGNORANT LAZY PEOPLE – A MATCH MADE (UP) IN (MADE UP) HEAVEN.
AND TO ALL THOSE PEOPLE WHO WON’T REALLY WORK TOGETHER (With some tough love not just faux-fluff luv)- BLESS YOURSELF, FOR THOU ART THE NEW AGE CHURCH!
martin keerns 